One Ring
One ring to rule them all …and in the darkness bind them.
Today’s One Ring is the corporate controlled media. The ‘news’ produced by the corporate-military-industrial-media binds the American people in Darkness. Important stories are ignored and unimportant stories are covered obsessively. ‘News’ is used to distract the American public and to keep us from focusing on the real reasons that this country is going to hell in a supersonic handbasket. The ‘News’ is used to subtly and not-so-subtly mold the populace into compliance with the goals and purposes of the corporate plutocratic kakistocracy.
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) said, during a speech at the recent National Conference for Media Reform (organized by Free Press) in Memphis, Tennessee, “If you are concerned about foreign policy in Iraq, if you are concerned about health care, if you are concerned about the economy, if you are concerned about global warming, you are kidding yourselves if you are not concerned about corporate control of the media.” He groks it - One Ring. He who controls the media controls the debate.
Another speaker at the National Conference for Media Reform, Representative Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), “plans to reintroduce the Media Ownership Reform Act (MORA) that would break up media monopolies and restore the Fairness Doctrine, which was eliminated by the Federal Communications Commission under the Reagan administration.” You can see a summary of the original MORA, H.R.3302 and download a pdf of the full bill at this link. One Ring - he groks it, too. In an article in the February 6, 2006 issue of The Nation he explicitly says so: “While every topic addressed in this special Nation issue is vital to America’s future, one issue binds them all together: media ownership reform. Whether it’s the war in Iraq or the latest Supreme Court decision, how and where Americans receive their news is critically important.” [emphasis mine]
The Free Expression Policy Project has an excellent “fact sheets” page where you can get a quick overview of the current state of affairs with some history, too, if you would like to get more information and news. Another good resource for info and news is the Center for Digital Democracy.
Direct action, for those of you can attend(via STOP BIG MEDIA):
The FCC is holding its third official public hearing on media ownership issues in Harrisburg, Pa., on Friday, Feb. 23, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. at the Whitaker Center for Science and the Arts on 222 Market Street.
I invite you all to watch Orwell Rolls in His Grave at Google video. The quality of the video is pretty low and you can’t read the graphics, but the message comes through in the voiceovers and interviews:
“Could a media system, controlled by a few global corporations with the ability to overwhelm all competing voices, be able to turn lies into truth?…”
This chilling documentary film examines the relationship between the media, corporate America, and government. In a country where the “top 1% control 90% of the wealth”, the film argues that the media system is nothing but a “subsidiary of corporate America.”
“One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.”
Great piece blueneck.
As I see the endless coverage of Anna Nicole Smith’s life and times these days, I think about the George Carlin piece I linked to a couple of days ago. He talks about the fact that the people in control don’t want an educated public - people who are capable of critical analysis.
His point was mainly to explain why efforts to improve our educational system never succeed (one of his great lines was to point out that we used to work on a “Head Start” but now its all about “No Child Left Behind.” Sounds like someone is loosing ground here).
But he also mentions this control of the media and its primary objective - which is to try and keep us all “clueless” and thinking that there is something important for us all in the life and times of ANS.
Comment by nlinstpaul — February 22, 2007 @ 2:52 pm
Well, bless Anna Nicole Smith and especially her baby daughter. I have plenty of compassion for them, but I think that their story is but one story among a million stories of single mothers who have problems. And the more urgent issues concern the single mothers who don’t have millions of dollars to hire nannies and live in a big house in a near paradise. What about the single mothers who make minimum wage at a job that purposely works them only 35 hours a week so as to deny them health care coverage for their children? Where’s the story on that? And why isn’t it getting 24/7 coverage? And what about the poor children who are orphaned to mothers who overdose in the ghettos of America every day? Where are their stories? Sauron’s got the Ring.
Comment by blueneck — February 22, 2007 @ 3:12 pm
Ain’t that the flippin’ truth blueneck. This whole Smith circus is out of hand. A judge weeping over his ruling? High drama. Who watches this crap anyway? Live coverage on MSNBC while Iraq burns? Grotesque.
Comment by alohaleezy — February 22, 2007 @ 3:32 pm
excellent stuff, bluneck, thx!
btw, frontline has a 3 part series, “Media Wars” (I think it’s called)
i taped & then recorded over pt. 1
pt 2 aired this week, was great. it re-airs here at least tonight (they weave the josh wolf story in seamlessly!)
i assume pt 3 will be next week, but dunno
I think you can watch it on their site, but being on dial-up, I haven’t tried
Comment by arcturus1 — February 22, 2007 @ 3:54 pm
Right on, leezy.
Thanks, arcturus, I’ll check into that.
Comment by blueneck — February 22, 2007 @ 4:02 pm
I was gonna post this separately, but this seems like an appropriate place:
Reuters to launch African website
Comment by arcturus1 — February 22, 2007 @ 4:33 pm
Well done, blueneck. I go to so many different news sources these days. It seems that this is the only way to get a somewhat accurate picture of what is actually happening in the world. Thank goodness for the internet.
Comment by boran2 — February 22, 2007 @ 7:24 pm
Thanks, boran2. I also view and read dozens of news sites on a regular or semi-regular basis. It’s a real job to be well informed these days, one that many folks can’t or won’t do.
Comment by blueneck — February 22, 2007 @ 7:43 pm
arcturus, the Reuters Africa development is very interesting and should be worth watching in the next couple of months - particularly the bloggers. Thanks for the tip!
Comment by canberra boy — February 22, 2007 @ 10:10 pm
i also like browsing the ones at alertnet now:
http://www.alertnet.org/index.htm
Comment by arcturus1 — February 22, 2007 @ 11:39 pm
In the 30 hours I had no internet access this week, and ONLY had the TV/cable stations to rely on for news, I about went nuts. I had no clue how totally dependent I had become on the internet for the news of my world. It was seriously disconcerting to only have what the taking heads were saying..it was nothing! Nothing of what I wanted to know..on the news I follow closely on a day to day basis online. It scared me, literally scared me to be so cut off, when my access went south.
That mass media is all the majority (?) of America ever sees, (if not plugged into the internet) really brought this topic home to me with a very huge “bang”. My gawd!! No wonder so many Americans slid so deeply into a consumerized coma and haven’t even notice what’s really going on.
Comment by scribe40 — February 23, 2007 @ 11:32 am
scribe,first of all, we missed you, and welcome back. I’m sorry you had to try to keep up with news via the military-industrial-media complex. But it does serve to show how terrible it is doesn’t it? Those of us who spend time actually searching out news on the net have a real advantage. Indeed, we are privileged to have the time and internet connection to do so. That is why WE must raise the alarm on this issue.
Comment by blueneck — February 23, 2007 @ 4:44 pm
I’m currently weighing if I have the available time and energy to start putting out a little news-in-brief newsletter here in this 100 unit apartment building, (mostly older folks who are not plugged into the net at all.) I did this before at another place, just a brief overview of current news people just do not get on TV and it was very well received and triggered interest to seek more info for many. Just have to make sure I am not spreading myself too thin here. (Retirement? HA! )
Comment by scribe40 — February 23, 2007 @ 5:42 pm
“Retirement? HA!”
I like that!
You have a wonderful idea. Maybe if you did it weekly it wouldn’t be too much?
Comment by blueneck — February 23, 2007 @ 6:02 pm
Thanks for another great offering, blueneck. The truth is the truth, isn’t it and it sure has a nasty stench these days.
I’m like the scribe. . .can’t believe what passes for news for the mass consumer audience, it ain’t what I’m hearing about. And if it weren’t for the www and blogs and individuals who are of like mind, I wouldn’t have a clue what is going on either.
I’ve started writing to my favorite local news channel, which happens to do a pretty good job on local stuff, but mostly regurgitates its ABC network newsie crap on national things. They have invited viewers to interact with them on their website and I have begun by pointing out to them everyday the important news they are not reporting and asking why. We’ll see if it has any impact or not, but I at least feel like I am doing SOMETHING.
After some on going and continuous burr under the saddle notes from me on an ongoing basis, I am going to ask them if they don’t want an elder essayists opinions about things in the nation that don’t get covered. I am going to volunteer to be a freelance essayist about important matters. We’ll see if I can put up something worthwhile and well enough written to get some attention. I don’t want or need the attention but these real news items do. Maybe I’ll call it “The News You Didn’t See This Week.”
Anyway, thanks again for all the good links everyone. I’ll be visiting those I’m not familiar with and make good use of them.
Many hugs,
Shirl
Comment by shirlstars — February 23, 2007 @ 8:05 pm
Wow, shirl, I’m impressed. What the people who complain about bloggers not being activists don’t know is that lots of us are very active in our communities on a wide variety of issues. Some of us don’t talk about it a lot. There’s nothing wrong with talking about it and sharing á la Janet, that’s freakin’ great and I strongly encourage it, but I just don’t feel comfortable telling about everything that I do. Sometime in the next couple of weeks I’m goin to pick up an award for something I helped start a while back that I am purposefully keeping off the blogs about, fr’instance. There is something to be said for a stealthy approach in certain cases…
But, back to the issue at hand, I REALLY appreciate and encourage your involvement with local media outlets. I STRONGLY believe that we need more people doing exactly what you are doing. I’m starting to think that maybe ‘EverybodyCFS’ could do something about this media stuff as a group project. If we could start a regular, “what you didn’t hear in the news today/this week” for people who aren’t aware beyond the MSM coverage. Then we would need to find places to get the info sent to, or printed out and distributed like scribe has done in the past…
Comment by blueneck — February 23, 2007 @ 9:21 pm
I am sure that your award is MORE THAN WELL DESERVED! I understand about the not mentioning the things we do so much. Sort of feels like, “look at me, I’m doing something.” Not that interested in being recognized for anything I do. Just doesn’t matter who gets credit just as long as the word gets out.
I think your suggestion about collaboration on news items/sources and in essence putting together a compilation is a wonderful idea. Maybe you and I and scribe and any others can do some email back and forth and help each other out. A great idea in my view.
Any of you can always find me at shirlstars@gmail.com
Thanks blueneck.
Hugs
Shirl
Comment by shirlstars — February 23, 2007 @ 9:31 pm
Shirl, I also think that when we are dealing with local issues, there’s not much that even the most well intentioned national blogsters can do about it. If I thought for a second that some of you could help with my most recent project, I would call on you. There is a slight possibility that sometime in the future I will need those of you with Democratic Senators to do some contact work, but if that eventuality arises, I know ya’ll will help me out. Until then, I am doing my best to work with the folks that can do something here on a local level about a local issue.
It has been said that “All politics is local.” I don’t agree with that in some cases, but in lots of cases it is very true. There is a difference between what Janet does and what I do. She works on an issue that is by definition national and international. I am very glad she shares her efforts with us and allows us to see into her life. When my efforts come to light someday I will share a long story with Everybody. Until then, I think it’s best that I keep my mouth shut.
As for collaborative efforts on producing some news for the content-deprived, I’m all for it and am willing to spend a few hours every week to get something done. As is always the case for me, I have to think about it some. I will have to devote some energy to getting a grasp on what it would be like to write for the chronicly under-informed. I think it’s a situation where we would have to be wary of the effect that the “expert’s mind” might have on it. Those of us who try hard to stay informed are coming from an entirely different place than our audience. Our target is not the intelligentsia so much as it is the average citizen. Hmmmm….
Comment by blueneck — February 23, 2007 @ 11:03 pm
Right you are, blueneck. I agree wholeheartedly with what Janet is doing and love her reporting about it. I agree with whatever our friends and allies are doing and love and look forward to hearing about their deeds and thoughts as well. I was referring to myself and apparently something that you feel a bit as well, that I don’t usually need or want to write about the things that I am doing. Didn’t intend any lack of respect or sense of awe at what folks choose to do and do so well.
I am not so much concerned about local news, although some of it is of import at times. It is the National news that our local stations do a piss poor job of. They are pretty darn good at the local stuff. If MSM networks aren’t reporting it, the average folks aren’t aware of it. So that is where I am coming from.
No worries about time to think about it or not having time or desire to collaborate. Whatever evolves or not is fine. I’ll keep on with my project and take it from there regardless.
I don’t expect that there will be droves of “average folks” that will be suddenly turned into news junkies, but maybe some will have a little more information than Anna Nichole and Brittney. I am a firm believer in the affect it might have on just one person is plenty fine with me. We never know who we might cause to think or find out more about something. I don’t need to know. I Just go forward knowing that someone somewhere will benefit.
Thanks
Shirl
Comment by shirlstars — February 23, 2007 @ 11:42 pm
…Didn’t intend any lack of respect or sense of awe…
I didn’t perceive any, but I just wanted to make a clear statement of support for all who do and say, as well as all who do and don’t. And since I hijacked my own story’s comments thread and turned it into something different, I just couldn’t stop myself
…maybe some will have a little more information…I Just go forward knowing that someone somewhere will benefit.
“If you save a single life, you save a whole universe.”
-(who said that????)
Comment by blueneck — February 24, 2007 @ 12:10 am
Rabbi Allan Greenbaum is who it is credited to, but it seems much older than that to me, perhaps it is paraphrased from something else.
Comment by shirlstars — February 24, 2007 @ 2:27 am
When I wrote that other small newsletter, I lived in a small rural conservative town and posted it in the two apartment buildings, the local diner, the laundromat and the local tavern.
(I always included some humor hooks too) I know it at least sparked many lively discussions, and I overheard more than one “I didn’t know THAT!” from the townies (who usually depended on Fox news!) Wrote it at about 8th grade level, no “analysis”,just a “Have you heard about this”..news blurb thing. It was fun, but got out of hand as there was no local newspaper there, and people kept wanting more content included. Overall though, the newsletter format is really effective, especially when personalized for the target readers.
Another anonymous form of “issue” actitivism I do is writing up small informational cards/flyers, carry them with me, stuffing them under windshields wipers in parking lots, sticking them on community bulletin boards, leaving them in waiting rooms, laundromats, dropping them on new racks in store entryways, and other covert actions!
I also have an pretty good sized emial list of really busy people with little time to surf for internet news, who like getting updates now and then.
“Anonymous activism”, or “covert activism” like this a neat way to inflitrate the grip of the mass media without providing a distracting “target” people will then use to deflect away from the issues. And it’s fun slinking around playing undercover activist!!
Comment by scribe40 — February 24, 2007 @ 6:51 am
…a neat way to inflitrate the grip of the mass media without providing a distracting “target” people will then use to deflect away from the issues…
Samizdat, anyone?
Comment by blueneck — February 24, 2007 @ 11:07 am